This article looks at the fundamental principles of solicitors conduct and how the #MeToo scandal has brought this to the forefront of the legal profession
The issue of a solicitor’s conduct has not been far from the public eye over recent months with a number of high profile cases bringing in to question the behaviour of members of the legal profession, in particular, cases involving sexual misconduct. In the wake of the #MeToo scandal a record number of cases were reported to the SRA last year1 and it is expected that there will be a further number of cases being referred to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) this year.
Honesty, integrity and behaving ethically are fundamental to what it means to be a solicitor and failing to act with these moral characteristics diminishes the confidence and trust the public places in the legal profession and the provision of legal services. The courts set the standard with regard to solicitors’ honesty in Bolton v Law Society [1993] EWCA Civ 322 by stating that solicitors are required to be “trusted to the end of the earth”.
In respect of integrity, a person has integrity when they have honest qualities and live by strong moral principles. As professionals, solicitors must act honestly, morally and ethically to a higher standard than is expected by society.
This characteristic was identified by Lord Justice Jackson when delivering his judgment on recent Court of Appeal cases Wingate & Evans v SRA and SRA v Malins [2018] EWCA Civ 3663.
In these cases the Court ruled that dishonesty and lack of integrity are not synonymous. When considering dishonesty, a person must be both objectively dishonest by everyday moral standards and act with the knowledge that their actions were wrong (Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] UKHL 124).
In SRA v Wingate & Anor [2016] EWHC 3455 (Admin)5 Mr Justice Holman said that dishonesty and integrity were not the same and whilst “all dishonesty involves a lack of integrity, not all lack of integrity involves dishonesty”.
________________
1. Beioley, K. (2019, September, 27). London law firms sex scandals near record high. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/267dc422-df78-11e9-b112-9624ec9edc59 2. https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/1993/32.html 3. https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2018/366.html 4. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd020321/yardle-1.htm 5. https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2016/3455.html (paragraph 47(1)
In Newell-Austin v SRA [2017] EWHC 411 (Admin)6 Mr Justice Morris defined integrity as “a moral soundness, rectitude and steady adherence to an ethical code”. Furthermore, an individual may lack integrity even if they have not been “established as being dishonest” and an objective test must be applied to establish the lack of integrity.
In recent years we have seen more emphasis being placed on the behaviour and conduct of individuals in positions of trust and responsibility. The legal profession has not been immune from this, and the SRA’s new Standards and Regulations (STaRs)7, which came into force on 25 November 2019 separated out the principles of honesty and integrity as two distinct values and requirements under Principles 4 and 5 respectively8. To maintain the trust that the public places in the legal profession it has become imperative that these characteristics and behaviours are embedded in a law firm’s culture and the SRA has recognised its responsibility to “promote a culture where ethical values and behaviours are embedded” within its regulated community.9
The SRA has maintained that it will take a robust approach to individuals falling short of the standards expected and will take disciplinary action against those individuals found to be acting with a lack of integrity. Such action may result in a referral to the SDT and strike off from the Roll of Solicitors for the most serious offences. The new STaRs10 introduced a requirement that all individuals connected with a law firm should report potential breaches of the SRA’s standards or requirements including behaviours that may present a risk to clients or public interests.
This is not just imposed on solicitors but anyone within the firm and that they can be subject to an SRA investigation.
Examples where such action will be taken against a law firm or an individual for a lack of integrity include11 :-
6. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff72d60d03e7f57ea928f (paragraphs 47(3) and 48) 7. Solicitors Regulation Authority. (2019). Standards and Regulations Resources. October 2019. Retrieved from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website: https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/standards-regulations-resources/ 8. Solicitors Regulation Authority. (2019). Retrieved from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website: https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/standards-regulations/principles 9. Solicitors Regulation Authority. (2019). Retrieved from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website: https://www.sra.org.uk/sra/strategy-2017-2020/sub-strategies/sra-enforcement-strategy/ 10. Solicitors Regulation Authority. (2019). Standards and Regulations Resources. October 2019. Retrieved from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website: https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/standards-regulations-resources/ 11. Solicitors Regulation Authority. (2019). Acting with Integrity. Retrieved from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website: https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/guidance/ethics-guidance/acting-with-integrity/
In respect of dishonesty, examples of when action will be taken include 12:-
The new STaRs focus on the ethical standards expected of those it regulates and the SRA’s new Enforcement Strategy13 considers types of conduct that are deemed unacceptable, there is a clear and strong message that stringent sanctions will be imposed for serious acts of misconduct.
12. Solicitors Regulation Authority. (2019). Acting with Honesty. Retrieved from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website: https://www.sra.org.uk/sra/decision-making/guidance/general-dishonesty/ 13. Solicitors Regulation Authority. (2019). SRA Enforcement Strategy. October 2019. Retrieved from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website: https://www.sra.org.uk/sra/strategy-2017-2020/sub-strategies/sra-enforcement-strategy/
The SRA is maintaining a robust approach to such conduct and at the SRA’s Compliance Officer Conference held last October, the Chief Executive Paul Philip stated that:
14. Hyde, J . (2019, November, 4). News focus: Compliance officer conference highlights regulatory burden. The Law Gazette. Retrieved from: https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news-focus/news-focus-compliance-officer-conference-highlights-regulatory-burden/5102033.article
15. Hyde, J . (2019, November, 6). Tribunal workload Slashed as SRA fails to take up sitting days. The Law Gazette. Retrieved from: https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/tribunal-workload-slashed-as-sra-fails-to-take-up-sitting-days/5102060.article
This publication offers a general overview of its subject matter. It does not necessarily address every aspect of its subject or every product available in the market. It is not intended to be, and should not be, used to replace specific advice relating to individual situations and we do not offer, and this should not be seen as, legal, accounting or tax advice. If you intend to take any action or make any decision on the basis of the content of this publication you should first seek specific advice from an appropriate professional. Some of the information in this publication may be compiled from third party sources we consider to be reliable, however we do not guarantee and are not responsible for the accuracy of such. The views expressed are not necessarily those of Willis Towers Watson.
Willis Towers Watson is a trading name of Willis Limited, Registered number: 181116 England and Wales. Registered address: 51 Lime Street, London EC3M 7DQ. A Lloyd’s Broker. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority for its general insurance mediation activities only.
Copyright © 2020 Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved. FPS:851 WTW-FINEX 428401/01/20
In light of the numbers of cases being considered during 2020 and the reporting obligations imposed on individuals to report such issues under the new STaRs, it is likely that the conduct of solicitors will be under greater scrutiny for some considerable time and it is anticipated solicitors conduct and regulatory sanctions will continue to be a defining feature of 2020.
Joanne Cracknell MSc LLB (Hons) Associate Director